Eletters
Topic:
Research Article
Godwin Nchinda, Janelle Kuroiwa, Margarita Oks, Christine Trumpfheller, Chae Gyu Park, Yaoxing Huang, Drew Hannaman, Sarah J. Schlesinger, Olga Mizenina, Michel C. Nussenzweig, Klaus Überla, Ralph M. Steinman
J. Clin. Invest. 2008;
118(4):1427
Enhancement of DNA vaccines
Bjarne Bogen | bjarne.bogen@medisin.uio.no
Other authors: Agnete B. Fredriksen1, Karoline W. Schjetne1, Keith M. Thompson1, Inger Sandlie2
Agnete B. Fredriksen1, Karoline W. Schjetne1, Keith M. Thompson1, Inger Sandlie2
1Center for Immune Regulation, Institute of Immunology, and 2Institute of Molecular Bioscience, University of Oslo
Published on April 14, 2008
The paper by Nchinda et al(1)
asks “..whether targeting vaccine antigens to DCs would increase the
immunity and protection that results from DNA vaccines”. By using
scFvDEC205-antigen fusion DNA constructs delivered i.m. with electroporation,
the authors clearly demonstrate this to be the case. The authors acknowledge
that a number of investigators have previously demonstrated an increased
efficiency of DNA vaccines that, as proteins, target molecules commonly
expressed on antigen presenting cells. They go on to state that these
previous reports “… have yet to prove that enhanced presentation
of vaccine antigens by DC is being achieved…”. Establishment of
this mechanism is the main focus of the paper. However, this mechanism
has been amply demonstrated earlier. Thus, an MHC class II-specific
scFv- tumor antigen DNA construct delivered i.m. with electroporation
was shown to enhance priming of antigen presenting cells in draining
lymph nodes, resulting in activation and proliferation of antigen-specific
CD4+ T cells and protection against a tumor challenge(2).
Targeting was shown to be essential. Similar results were obtained by
using a scFv from an agonistic anti-CD40 mAb(3) and CCL3 chemokine(4)
as targeting units. Bivalency and inclusion of foreign sequences increased
the efficiency of targeted vaccine proteins (4). Although CD11c+
DC appear to be crucial for the enhanced efficiency of targeted DNA
vaccines(1), future studies should further delineate the phenotypic
characteristics of relevant antigen presenting cells, and what surface
molecules that may be the best targets for induction of the various
arms of immunity. It should also be established whether antigen presenting
cells are primed with targeted vaccine proteins in muscle or in draining
lymph nodes. Targeted recombinant Ig-based vaccines, pioneered in the
1990s, clearly enhance DNA immunization and are likely to yield new
and more efficient vaccines for infectious diseases and perhaps also
for cancer.
Reference List
1. Nchinda,G., Kuroiwa,J.,
Oks,M., Trumpfheller,C., Park,C.G., Huang,Y., Hannaman,D., Schlesinger,S.J.,
Mizenina,O., Nussenzweig,M.C. et al 2008. The efficacy of DNA vaccination
is enhanced in mice by targeting the encoded protein to dendritic cells
J Clin. Invest.
2. Fredriksen,A.B.,
Sandlie,I., and Bogen,B. 2006. DNA vaccines increase immunogenicity
of idiotypic tumor antigen by targeting novel fusion proteins to antigen-presenting
cells Mol. Ther. 13:776-785.
3. Schjetne,K.W.,
Fredriksen,A.B., and Bogen,B. 2007. Delivery of antigen to CD40 induces
protective immune responses against tumors J Immunol 178:4169-4176.
4. Fredriksen,A.B.,
and Bogen,B. 2007. Chemokine-idiotype fusion DNA vaccines are potentiated
by bivalency and xenogeneic sequences. Blood 110:1797-1805.
Response to Bogen
Ralph Steinman | steinma@mail.rockefeller.edu
The Rockefeller University
Published on May 6, 2008
Our recent study had the two new goals, as stated in the last paragraph of the Introduction and summarized again in the first paragraph of the Discussion to: 1) prove that dendritic cell (DC) targeting is indeed occurring when one designs a DC targeted vaccine, as documented in Figure 2, and 2) determine if DC targeting can decisively lower the dose of DNA that is required for inducing T cell immunity including protective immunity, as documented in Figures 4 and 5.
These concepts are unique to our paper, and the paper Professor Bogen refers to does not completely address either issue, i.e., to document the cell types that are presenting antigens from the vaccine and to show a reduction in DNA dose. Furthermore, the study they cite targeted MHC II, which is not a marker for specific types of antigen presenting cells.